The Point Misser

Listen.

The clinking of cups.

The crackling of milk frothing.

The animated chatter of young teenagers taking group photos on their phones.

A young woman with unbrushed hair piled into a bun sits sketching the scene from a sofa in the corner, taking a sip of her skinny cappuccino every now and then. That is, until a bird-like man in wire rimmed glasses and an oversized tracksuit perches on the arm. Looking up from her pad the artist lets out a short sigh. She considers that she really should be more welcoming of the opportunity to mix with strange people, but this guy is blocking her view of youth culture. It is important to study such things if you want to really make it. 

“Good afternoon Ma’am. I am The Magician.” He extends his hand in greeting. She tucks her pad away in her rucksack, resigning to a loss of moment, and shakes with him.

“The Magician?”

“Yes.” He pushes his glasses further up his nose. “I have some words to impart.”

He is met with a raised eyebrow, but proceeds with his prepared monologue anyway. As he does so, the cafe falls silent.

***

“There is a part of every one of us that can interpret strange and abstract languages. A part that believes paradox to be the only thing that makes sense. A part that creates new impressions from old reliefs. It is the eternal, the ever turning star at our core; and it is clothed in our own personal myth.

Our myth is dependant upon our unique experiences, imprints and obsessions. We all have an idea we return to again and again, even if that idea is destruction or void. It is essentially the final filter that protects us from staring directly into the sun.

We need myth to be attached to something so that it can be explained: a person, a lost time, an image, a number. But then we mistake what it is attached to for the real deal, without seeing that myth is not a rational beast: it can only be viewed in the peripheries of our mind. Anything we focus upon directly is only a layer of illusion, it is a lens. If we become infatuated with the lens itself, what we are trying to look at through it withers away, and we are left with nothing but fistfuls of dust. It is the mental equivalent of picking a beautiful flower and putting it in a vase to die. Sometimes knowing a thing exists in its own way, even if you can’t possess it, is enough.

In its raw form, the centre of every myth is an urge. A bright will. Look at yours through whatever lens you need to, but remember it is the energy itself you need to capture. Bottle it, use it for something that won’t destroy you.”

***

The hum and chatter recommences.

“But you don’t look like a magician…”

“Huh?”

“You said you were a magician.”

The Magician.”

“You don’t look like one.”

“And just how should The Magician look, Ma’am?”

The artist begins to scribble on a napkin, and when she is done she lifts it to show a figure in a top hat and tails, holding a wand in one hand and a white rabbit in the other. It is a rough sketch but perfect in proportion.

The Magician furrows his brow.

“Ah. Then you, Ma’am, are what I call a point misser. Sorry to have disturbed you. Have a good day.” Had he been wearing a top hat, he’d have tipped it for sure.

The Magician makes a swift exit. The artist shrugs, and goes back to her coffee.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “The Point Misser

  1. I empathize with The Magician’s disappointment. A common Zen koan warns us not to mistake a finger pointing at the moon for the moon itself. A hidden layer of that piece of wisdom is that one also shouldn’t mistake its words for the actual wordless message implied. Your message comes through loud and clear…as long as its recipient understands the nature of a messenger. Mind expanding stuff, as ever.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. There is nothing worse than when you tell someone something, and the only thing they hear is the least significant bit of what you said. Or miss the point entirely. Your story is fantastic, and I totally get it. I would like to meet this magician! Well done!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Wow. This one definitely deserved (and required, in my case) a re-read. I think I’ve sort of got it now, but any further explanation would be much appreciated 😛 Is it in the same vein of thought as René Magritte’s The Treachery of Images?
    Loved the bit of ironic humour at the end.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s